Send to a friend | Search | Login/sign up | Italiano |

On the Avatar (Part 2)

It would be interesting to study how alterations in the chemical elements that make up a cell can produce modifications in behaviour; with this sort of information available I could explain better what, not an Avatar but, evolution really is, because what we read in books is not quite clear.

I have hinted at the meaning of the word Avatar since you are all interested. It’s not what you know or suppose, not at all like that: I hope not for all of you. I don’t know just how many of you understand the meaning of connections between atoms, or what the “behaviour” of several atoms put together in our bodies is; the “combinations” in molecules and neurons adapted to new behaviour, the entanglement of understanding, the unfolding and deepening of understanding…
Connecting several things is fundamental to those minds that have to develop intuition, if you do not really achieve this ability to connect, you will not be able to work.
You have to be on your toes all the time, what‘s important is to be successful in interactions that increase intuition as a whole. All of you, clearly in as much as separate entities whose wishes are separation to a greater degree, have not fully understood that the way we’re going is quite different, and you confine your existence to being concerned with your own affairs; I’m not saying it’s “wrongful”, just that it’s hardly “suitable” within the sphere of this discussion on seeking the “non-being”.

Well, what happens then?
If you have little interest in this you will not achieve much, try to understand this. At times some of you are a bit “strange” (but more real); you have your “little problems”.

Multibase is a research centre… a centre for researching the force of a Base. What will the common Base be? That Base that has been explained to you thoroughly.
The Base is not like the brain, where you think “ME” and fish out what you need for your own freedom, i.e. to concern yourselves with your own affairs. It is definitely a being’s inviolable right to have a mind of their own!

Talking of brain mappings, the more reliable scientists admit that science hasn’t got much to say, just as in climate matters. Those who say they have “understood” only do it to make money out of it. Money out of ignorance! It is certainly difficult to set out to watch, immersed in mental time, the timeless turning of electrons around the nucleus (TRUE?). This is the reason why we are obliged to speak of “electron clouds”, we are obliged to say: “either I can see where it is, or I can see at what speed it is travelling, or I can see the way it is ‘wandering about’” (SEE?).
Who is “wandering about”? What?
A certain “something” that seems to have a certain behaviour.
Then, if this “something” is an element made up in a certain way and joins up with other elements in very precise numbers (see appendix “Clusters and superatoms”), scientists find they’re dealing with another system and, another behaviour! (Mica eggs, see appendix “Low energy biological transmutation”).
This is where differences between individuals must derive from, differences in understanding, in mental stability, in equilibrium. There are mechanisms and interactions that determine the Real functioning of a being. One must really interact, connecting many parts of consciousness, science and intuition.

Each organism is structured in order to function connected – quite distinctly – with the brain and with the entire complex mind system.
But then, interactions are triggered off that can upset any scientist who wishes to realize a precise mapping of interactions without leaving room for doubts.

What is an Avatar? Or better still, what does this unfamiliar word, so popular these days in our human consciousness, evoke in most people?
Up to the brain we are sentient beings, all of us: separated, in interaction (or entanglement). Entanglement depends on the value of words, the biochemical value of the organism as a whole, the value of the functionality of the elements in your cells; the harmonious or inharmonious behaviour of certain cells, or all of them, the cancer that’s killing you, the mental agitations that mess up your existence…
Up until here it’s all very clear: interaction between brain, organism, culture, mind, “disasters” in our existence, a variety of problems and all those things that common sentient beings create with their own mental convulsions.
But, at a certain point, we get a glimpse, a suspicion, of a vaster entanglement, of which we have numerous elements – biophotons, neurons, interaction, spin, etc – and which make of us a sort of fulcrum of the “universal soup”.
In this “soup” we interact; at times we smell celery, at times cheese and at other times tomatoes… depending on what attracts us most.

I remember there were scientists who were studying a drink to match against the soft drinks that have invaded the world.
When they tasted it, one of them said: “This drink isn’t bad, actually it’s really good!” Another one protested: “It’s disgusting, it’s salty!” Instead the third complained: “Dear me, it’s too sweet”. While the three of them were debating another scientist arrived, tasted it and decided: “But it doesn’t taste of anything, it’s like water”.
After having eyed each other suspiciously, the four of them realized that even an infinitesimal variation in the saliva pH was enough to change the taste of that drink.

It is quite clear that each being, however things may turn out, is this “spread” of immense “intellect” in the universe, even if they say they have other things to do, they have “their own problems”, they are angry, not feeling well and then… “mind your own business”.
It is you who does not want to be connected and it’s you who’s not feeling well. You’re not well because you have an identity that you recognise: you and your mind; thus you avoid becoming to a greater degree what you are.
You are the entire “spread” of intellect, you are connected with the whole system… the silver thread and all the stories you’ve heard (T. Lobsang Rampa).
The books you’ve read have revealed a few things in between the chat, the exaggerations, increasing here and there or toning down. About what? About something real simple! Your vaster interaction.
Now you are even being told by nuclear physics, sub-nuclear physics, etc. Again we’re talking about an even greater interaction with something that, in the end, turns out to be intuition.
Your enthusiastic reactions, when you read scientific articles or books, are a demonstration that you are connecting, using a greater intuitive ability, through a “nature” that does not come from the brain but from your universality. It is still “me”; did you think it was someone else?
A part of me could be spread inside someone else because we have a bit of entanglement and a few atoms in common. This does not mean that one is transgressing.
It is not possible to transgress the Nature of the Divine, the Nature of All Things, the Nature of the Law of God. It can’t be done.
The house is the universe, if you think you are separated from it, what can I do about that?

I cannot help you at all because you have the freedom to stay connected, or not, only between you and your brain. If you do not want to connect with the intellect, there’s nothing that can be done about that.
I would like to help you overcome this catastrophic limitation that happens when you live only and exclusively your body and your mind, but I cannot do much more than stimulate you.
At some point, you created a situation that is perhaps positive; that of seeking within.
Watching you believe, in a certain path, that there is the “inner nature” of beings, separated... of course… separated. As you return home, open the door, place yourselves right on the dividing line that separates inside from outside and tell me the meaning of “inside” and “outside”.
Are you convinced you have “your own house”… I hope you can take it to your grave. As long as “yours” exists then it’s right. It’s right for the survival of sentient beings, in as much as it is considered what is necessary for a honourable existence; but leading a honourable existence does not mean being a honourable idiot, it means knowing how to separate the identities in use, the possessions in use, the ways of living in use.
All this is right, but are you able to separate all the things-you-have-in-use from your true nature or identity?
No!
I am obliged to think that you’re not doing that; you have your bodies, your homes, your minds, your thoughts… and this organises your suffering.
I have: “whatever” happens, whatever house, whatever food, whatever body.
On the threshold I cannot distinguish which Side is Him and which side, on the other side, is him.
Is it Him or isn’t it him?
Is it Him with the capital letter or him with the small letter?
Well, to be fair, do you know what I do?
On one Side I am Him with the capital letter and on the other side I am him with the small letter; on either side, there is never anything that isn’t Him, perhaps.

I hear people say: “me, part of Him? You’re mad… it’s not allowed!”
Someone else says: “Only if you get crucified can you become like Him”, or “only if you build a pharaoh-type tomb will you become a deity”.
The Buddhist: “You’ve become a Buddha? Well then, God is neither on this side nor on the Other Side, let’s overcome dichotomy and end the argument”.
The Hindu: “One? There are 40 thousand deities; this way there are more, and it’s better to have them all together on this side”.
But, there is Brahman…
“Who’s on the other side?”
On the other side must be Brahman who “sent” Brahma here.
They have the same surname so there’s no arguing about it. It’s just that one has a final “n”, so there are multitudes of them, and on the other there’s no “n”, so we know there’s One Only.
One for each universe; but, if the universes are infinite then there are infinite Brahmas.
All of them together make a Brahma, and what’s the result? Trumps! Sweep the board! Tricks! Whist! Rummy! Poker! What kind of game is this? All you have to do is change the value of the words and the result doesn’t change; there’s always someone who wins and someone who loses.

Of all the numberless names given to the Absolute, the One, who will win?
I’ll put myself on that “spread”, at the centre; I’ll be the guardian of the Threshold and ask: “Who wins?”
On that Side there’s only Him, He wins.
On this side, who is there? Numberless universes.
Numberless “against” One.
Isn’t it the same? If we lose all the numberless, does the One win? If we lose the One, do the numberless win? Or are they too the One?
Well, if on this side they want to win, let them win!
Do you want to win? Well, win then! Stay separate and do not disturb anymore!
What is the freedom of all beings? Infinite? Great! This is why being Avatar is very easy, it’s a breeze. Who do you want to win? The Absolute?! What an effort being “that” which you already are!
No, I’ll stay on this side of the boundary, and on the other side there’s a mirror.
So, if there is a mirror, there’s nothing on the other side!
It’s always you on this side making faces in front of the mirror which is on the other Side.
Have you ever noticed that when you make faces in front of a mirror you are pulling faces at yourselves?
Or did you think it was at someone else.
When you do something in your lives, who are you doing it to?
To yourselves.
Who is on the other side? Nothing… or…
On the other side there is God!
(continues…)

Dowload - New!



	Send to a friend \| Search \| Login/sign up \| Italiano \|
	Home Guide to the Site What's new That Which Has Been Said Words? 119. On the Avatar (Part 4) 118. On the Avatar (Part 3) 117. On the Avatar (Part 2) 115. On Experimenting 106. On the Avatar 101. On Interaction (Entanglement) 39. On The Angel 38. On 'The Other' 35. On The Gravity Of The Absolute (Part 1) 33. On The Continuance Of Existence (Part 2) 32. Disorderly Steps In The Phenomenal (Questions) 31. On The Continuance of Existence (Part 1) 30. The Path To The Base (Part 3) 29. Disorderly Steps in the Phenomenal (Value) 28. On the Boundary (of the Mind) 27. The Boundary on the Center 26. On the Equanimity in the World of Phenomena 25. On the Consciousness of Phenomena 24. Pure Uncontaminated Consciousness 23. On the Nature of Events 22. On The Invisible Being 21. The Tear 20. The Path To The Base (Part 2) 19. The Path To The Base (Part 1) 18. On Transmission 17. On the Two Points 16. On The Boundary-Non Boundary 15. The Harmonic Inconceivable Interaction 14. On The Emptiness of Identity 13. Themes Related To The Base 12. A Vision Of The Base 11. Undefined Paradise 10. On Non-Action 09. Thusness 08. Emptiness 07. Skillful Means 06. On Love 05. On The Paradise Within 04. On Wisdom 03. The Mind Appendix	On the Avatar (Part 2) It would be interesting to study how alterations in the chemical elements that make up a cell can produce modifications in behaviour; with this sort of information available I could explain better what, not an Avatar but, evolution really is, because what we read in books is not quite clear. I have hinted at the meaning of the word Avatar since you are all interested. It’s not what you know or suppose, not at all like that: I hope not for all of you. I don’t know just how many of you understand the meaning of connections between atoms, or what the “behaviour” of several atoms put together in our bodies is; the “combinations” in molecules and neurons adapted to new behaviour, the entanglement of understanding, the unfolding and deepening of understanding… Connecting several things is fundamental to those minds that have to develop intuition, if you do not really achieve this ability to connect, you will not be able to work. You have to be on your toes all the time, what‘s important is to be successful in interactions that increase intuition as a whole. All of you, clearly in as much as separate entities whose wishes are separation to a greater degree, have not fully understood that the way we’re going is quite different, and you confine your existence to being concerned with your own affairs; I’m not saying it’s “wrongful”, just that it’s hardly “suitable” within the sphere of this discussion on seeking the “non-being”. Well, what happens then? If you have little interest in this you will not achieve much, try to understand this. At times some of you are a bit “strange” (but more real); you have your “little problems”. Multibase is a research centre… a centre for researching the force of a Base. What will the common Base be? That Base that has been explained to you thoroughly. The Base is not like the brain, where you think “ME” and fish out what you need for your own freedom, i.e. to concern yourselves with your own affairs. It is definitely a being’s inviolable right to have a mind of their own! Talking of brain mappings, the more reliable scientists admit that science hasn’t got much to say, just as in climate matters. Those who say they have “understood” only do it to make money out of it. Money out of ignorance! It is certainly difficult to set out to watch, immersed in mental time, the timeless turning of electrons around the nucleus (TRUE?). This is the reason why we are obliged to speak of “electron clouds”, we are obliged to say: “either I can see where it is, or I can see at what speed it is travelling, or I can see the way it is ‘wandering about’” (SEE?). Who is “wandering about”? What? A certain “something” that seems to have a certain behaviour. Then, if this “something” is an element made up in a certain way and joins up with other elements in very precise numbers (see appendix “Clusters and superatoms”), scientists find they’re dealing with another system and, another behaviour! (Mica eggs, see appendix “Low energy biological transmutation”). This is where differences between individuals must derive from, differences in understanding, in mental stability, in equilibrium. There are mechanisms and interactions that determine the Real functioning of a being. One must really interact, connecting many parts of consciousness, science and intuition. Each organism is structured in order to function connected – quite distinctly – with the brain and with the entire complex mind system. But then, interactions are triggered off that can upset any scientist who wishes to realize a precise mapping of interactions without leaving room for doubts. What is an Avatar? Or better still, what does this unfamiliar word, so popular these days in our human consciousness, evoke in most people? Up to the brain we are sentient beings, all of us: separated, in interaction (or entanglement). Entanglement depends on the value of words, the biochemical value of the organism as a whole, the value of the functionality of the elements in your cells; the harmonious or inharmonious behaviour of certain cells, or all of them, the cancer that’s killing you, the mental agitations that mess up your existence… Up until here it’s all very clear: interaction between brain, organism, culture, mind, “disasters” in our existence, a variety of problems and all those things that common sentient beings create with their own mental convulsions. But, at a certain point, we get a glimpse, a suspicion, of a vaster entanglement, of which we have numerous elements – biophotons, neurons, interaction, spin, etc – and which make of us a sort of fulcrum of the “universal soup”. In this “soup” we interact; at times we smell celery, at times cheese and at other times tomatoes… depending on what attracts us most. I remember there were scientists who were studying a drink to match against the soft drinks that have invaded the world. When they tasted it, one of them said: “This drink isn’t bad, actually it’s really good!” Another one protested: “It’s disgusting, it’s salty!” Instead the third complained: “Dear me, it’s too sweet”. While the three of them were debating another scientist arrived, tasted it and decided: “But it doesn’t taste of anything, it’s like water”. After having eyed each other suspiciously, the four of them realized that even an infinitesimal variation in the saliva pH was enough to change the taste of that drink. It is quite clear that each being, however things may turn out, is this “spread” of immense “intellect” in the universe, even if they say they have other things to do, they have “their own problems”, they are angry, not feeling well and then… “mind your own business”. It is you who does not want to be connected and it’s you who’s not feeling well. You’re not well because you have an identity that you recognise: you and your mind; thus you avoid becoming to a greater degree what you are. You are the entire “spread” of intellect, you are connected with the whole system… the silver thread and all the stories you’ve heard (T. Lobsang Rampa). The books you’ve read have revealed a few things in between the chat, the exaggerations, increasing here and there or toning down. About what? About something real simple! Your vaster interaction. Now you are even being told by nuclear physics, sub-nuclear physics, etc. Again we’re talking about an even greater interaction with something that, in the end, turns out to be intuition. Your enthusiastic reactions, when you read scientific articles or books, are a demonstration that you are connecting, using a greater intuitive ability, through a “nature” that does not come from the brain but from your universality. It is still “me”; did you think it was someone else? A part of me could be spread inside someone else because we have a bit of entanglement and a few atoms in common. This does not mean that one is transgressing. It is not possible to transgress the Nature of the Divine, the Nature of All Things, the Nature of the Law of God. It can’t be done. The house is the universe, if you think you are separated from it, what can I do about that? I cannot help you at all because you have the freedom to stay connected, or not, only between you and your brain. If you do not want to connect with the intellect, there’s nothing that can be done about that. I would like to help you overcome this catastrophic limitation that happens when you live only and exclusively your body and your mind, but I cannot do much more than stimulate you. At some point, you created a situation that is perhaps positive; that of seeking within. Watching you believe, in a certain path, that there is the “inner nature” of beings, separated... of course… separated. As you return home, open the door, place yourselves right on the dividing line that separates inside from outside and tell me the meaning of “inside” and “outside”. Are you convinced you have “your own house”… I hope you can take it to your grave. As long as “yours” exists then it’s right. It’s right for the survival of sentient beings, in as much as it is considered what is necessary for a honourable existence; but leading a honourable existence does not mean being a honourable idiot, it means knowing how to separate the identities in use, the possessions in use, the ways of living in use. All this is right, but are you able to separate all the things-you-have-in-use from your true nature or identity? No! I am obliged to think that you’re not doing that; you have your bodies, your homes, your minds, your thoughts… and this organises your suffering. I have: “whatever” happens, whatever house, whatever food, whatever body. On the threshold I cannot distinguish which Side is Him and which side, on the other side, is him. Is it Him or isn’t it him? Is it Him with the capital letter or him with the small letter? Well, to be fair, do you know what I do? On one Side I am Him with the capital letter and on the other side I am him with the small letter; on either side, there is never anything that isn’t Him, perhaps. I hear people say: “me, part of Him? You’re mad… it’s not allowed!” Someone else says: “Only if you get crucified can you become like Him”, or “only if you build a pharaoh-type tomb will you become a deity”. The Buddhist: “You’ve become a Buddha? Well then, God is neither on this side nor on the Other Side, let’s overcome dichotomy and end the argument”. The Hindu: “One? There are 40 thousand deities; this way there are more, and it’s better to have them all together on this side”. But, there is Brahman… “Who’s on the other side?” On the other side must be Brahman who “sent” Brahma here. They have the same surname so there’s no arguing about it. It’s just that one has a final “n”, so there are multitudes of them, and on the other there’s no “n”, so we know there’s One Only. One for each universe; but, if the universes are infinite then there are infinite Brahmas. All of them together make a Brahma, and what’s the result? Trumps! Sweep the board! Tricks! Whist! Rummy! Poker! What kind of game is this? All you have to do is change the value of the words and the result doesn’t change; there’s always someone who wins and someone who loses. Of all the numberless names given to the Absolute, the One, who will win? I’ll put myself on that “spread”, at the centre; I’ll be the guardian of the Threshold and ask: “Who wins?” On that Side there’s only Him, He wins. On this side, who is there? Numberless universes. Numberless “against” One. Isn’t it the same? If we lose all the numberless, does the One win? If we lose the One, do the numberless win? Or are they too the One? Well, if on this side they want to win, let them win! Do you want to win? Well, win then! Stay separate and do not disturb anymore! What is the freedom of all beings? Infinite? Great! This is why being Avatar is very easy, it’s a breeze. Who do you want to win? The Absolute?! What an effort being “that” which you already are! No, I’ll stay on this side of the boundary, and on the other side there’s a mirror. So, if there is a mirror, there’s nothing on the other side! It’s always you on this side making faces in front of the mirror which is on the other Side. Have you ever noticed that when you make faces in front of a mirror you are pulling faces at yourselves? Or did you think it was at someone else. When you do something in your lives, who are you doing it to? To yourselves. Who is on the other side? Nothing… or… On the other side there is God! (continues…) Dowload - New!