Send to a friend | Search | Login/sign up | Italiano |

On Interaction (Entanglement)

You are rich to the same degree that you have done, and to the same degree that you want to do, good to others.
Among you there are, and “rightly so”, also those who, internally poor, think about everything except helping other people, because they have too many personal problems. Others, instead, have various kinds of disorders, for example the Resentful Recipient Syndrome. They were, and still are, bowls that are poisoned, upturned, fractured, indeed all the more so.
For sure you have achieved a wonderful thing: the certainty of having done, in one lifetime, what could be considered the highest good.
“Doing good” is not the theory of eco-terrorists, the bio-poisoned and other mafias and ideologies. These bio-terrorists, and suchlike, only instigate fear.
Doing good means treading a healthy path, which - if you keep behaving like “good seekers” - will allow you to proceed in a healthy way in all the sciences and in the different repercussions of research.
I hope that your “university of research” will come into being with a Nobel Prize, a technical revolution and a resolution for the world, on the hunger/energy level and with an economy and finance completely unyoked from the systems that serve only to exploit and dominate “the perennial losers”.
It is clear: it doesn’t pay to be subjected to any of the investment and finance schemes we have been “administered” until now.

As already explained, the shaman is concerned with a certain kind of entanglement. If you learn to do even more what you already are, you’ll be more concretely involved in those entanglement relations that will go towards creating “the right situation”, the one that each one has already chosen.

The right situation is always what you decide for everybody's good: that is the right “thing” for you. Still if that “you” is only egotism, rest assured that it will never work.

If you are at a certain level and you realize that your “for the others” is always all for you, that's real egotism. “How much” is your entanglement? With “how many” particles? Of how many beings? What is the meaning of this separation of the entanglements based on the number of spins? It means that you're still isolated, you don't have universal consciousness.
Here’s where the Avatar's “trick” lies, it’s just a matter of not being only yourselves; one “looks like” oneself but one is also the others: one is the one who’s starving, who eats more, who is ill, who is healthy...
You think that it's not profitable, well, you’re making the mistake of identifying yourselves exclusively with a little bit of “meat”, a few sensations and a stream of mental inventions. Unfortunately this is the job you should be doing.

Those who are not yet ready to operate will have the chance to study and live quietly; others instead, after having studied, will start to work concretely.
You work until you have seriously learnt to walk the right Way, not according to the stale criteria belonging to systems aimed at maintaining a certain status quo worldwide: a billion and two hundred million people are destined to die of hunger; a few millions of Chinese individuals who aim at global slavery (even if they already own over a billion slaves); the Americans getting hooked on Chinese technological and economic control; the eco-imperialists’ decided determination to prevent Africa from utilizing the most advanced technologies and all the various deceitful and misleading strategies for domination (see: Eco-Imperialism: Green Power, Black Death)1

We are not dying from malaria and other kinds of illnesses anymore, whereas in the developing countries millions are dying (because DDT hurts!)
It didn't hurt us, and there are no more mosquitoes.
About twenty years ago, a scientist said that - because of DDT – a generation of bears with both male and female genital organs were born.
This is the “damage” caused by DDT. What about the millions of people who die because it is not being used?
Animal rights activists become enraged if an animal dies, yet they don't care about the death of a billion and two hundred million human beings, including children.

Be aware, then, that we have to commit ourselves to a job which is different from the one we have performed until now. Have you started to understand entanglement? If you become what you “are in Reality” it’s good enough, you’re giving each other a hand.
It doesn’t take much; all it takes is being and non-being at one and the same time. When necessary, “being”; when not necessary, “non-being”.
Maybe this is the symbolism of the teaching of Christ handed down to us: “If someone slaps you on the right cheek, turn the other cheek”, but if you don't have the other cheek... (you are non-being).
If someone strikes you on that cheek that is, namely “being”, turn the other “non-being” cheek so nobody can strike you. It’s simply a matter of not being.
Understand?
If you're “being” you are upset, if you are “non-being” you don't get upset! Nobody can strike you.
It is necessary to know how to use your opponent’s energies as well, otherwise what kind of “martial art” is this? It is fun to fight without using our own strength but simply making use of the other person’s strength: you don’t even have to move, they're going to harm themselves on their own anyway.

We need to talk about technology and connect it to evolution. Technology is the connected activation of certain laws in the Base.
All laws are in the timeless Base and become “activated” (they become awareness and knowledge for sentient beings) little by little, (in illusory time) depending on the evolutionary coincidences of the projects.
Therefore, in this moment, both in the project and in the clock of the universe, certain laws had to be “activated” but then everything depends on how the consciousness in individuals moves and if such evolutions are used for good or for evil.

Let's just try and understand what this technology is for: it will soon become known to the general public. With this technology it is possible to use what is good and pure by disaggregating matter. Humanity needs something pure; in fact the World Food Program (WFP) deals both with quantity and QUALITY of food.
By decomposing matter into its different constituent parts, this technology makes use of what is healthy because it separates it from what is not. Then again, what's not healthy as food can be good for energy or other purposes (for example lignin and cellulose). This technology could even turn a very toxic plant into something edible, by extracting the poison and separating it from the non-noxious components.
Those who oppose this are beings that, psychologically speaking, cannot use their good part – maybe because they don't have one and what they have is mental mystification – thus they cannot participate in what is good.

The use of this “?” technology is the use of a few laws put together that are, yes, always present, but not in use.
Some people are not bad but they have a mental block that prevents them from catching and developing a series of “suggestions” (right things) that would make them understand. Being good is not enough; one also needs to be able to implement all the possible projections of what has been discovered at the scientific level.

It's not that one must not trust beings per se; their minds are not to be trusted. If one can't see what should be (science) in their intellect, then what can I do?
You have not managed to accumulate what is needed in your intellect, therefore give us no advice! You are not here today, you will be in the next world; and if not in the next world, you will be in the next universe (IRONIC).

All the laws are already present and their use can be “improper” - like the atomic bomb – and “proper”, like well-employed radioactivity in medical technology. Both generate different kinds of pain but one could not really say that those pains are not “due” because, in the Perfection of the Absolute this, too, is already considered.

It's simple. God is for everybody; each one for themselves and god for all Therefore, certain laws are usable only if they take the correct path, otherwise they are not discovered. If they come out, it means that the moment is right, also because I find one billion and 200 millions of starving people rather excessive.

It's the signal that it is time to make a change, the only possible one. To prevent it they would have to stop a “?”, that turns a cheek to you one time and then turns another next time. They would have to stop people whose intent, I believe, is pure....not everybody indeed, there are always those who are more egotist, who have personal interests, who haven't given all of themselves, those who did as much as they could or as little as they could, when they could, at different times....It doesn't count if it's at different times, not even if they were times from another existence, a previous life. It's all the same. It would be the same thing even if one of you had taken the trouble as a caveman to bring food to everybody rather than eating it alone.
That alone would already be enough to make that person adequate for operating.

“Capturing” a system organized by laws, that are already present, is allowed only because there are expectations for using it correctly. “Correct” means that it must not be used to maintain the status quo of hunger and utilized egotistically by opportunists who only mind their own business.
The implications are infinitesimal and don't cause any preoccupation, in that we are not the ones who have to worry, but the others.
I do not intend to worry and I don't believe that you're going to use the laws in a bad way. I believe in your good intentions of putting a stop to the destruction caused by materialism, egotism, unconcern for the world's hunger.
It's obvious, how can those who have hunger problems of their own be worried about the world's hunger problems?

We will try and arrange things so that those who work in our direction need not worry anymore about their own survival and also get rid of all their prejudices in their relationships with different persons, since everybody has their unique and individual path. The “spread” (interaction) in the universe is different. All those beings aiming at their own individuality are aiming at their separation, their personal gain and they separate themselves from the vaster “spread” that makes one fully become what one is: being right through to the very soul (therefore physical, astral, mental, intellect and soul) and non-being. Thus we understand each other better and, as we speak, your worries will disappear little by little.

Until you reach the Soul everybody can focus on themselves, on their “fulcrum”. Until you reach the Soul this is allowed. The “fulcrum” would be the central part of the spider-net entanglement, of the “spread” of the universal entanglement.
Sooner or later you're going to think: “until now I have separated myself, how can I unite myself now?”
Having only been used to being united in a physical sense, you will find difficulties at the sensational level: “I can't stand that person, he makes my skin crawl”. At the mental level, it is even worse, the mental pain that you experience is horrible and there are times I can't even conceive or understand it; you self-generate a series of situations that represent the “experimentation” you're going to knock your head (mind) against.
You are what attracts that experience, you go looking for it because you create it.
What does the system tell you? You already are, deep inside you, the Nature of the Absolute, therefore you are already being and non-being, you are already “more Reality”, you're already a Realized-One and so on; you have the freedom of deciding about your future, are you deciding that it will be wonderful? It will be. Don't do the opposite, it's not worth it!
You chose it yourself, in your Divine Reality.
You represent your own future: go ahead, you’re more than welcome to whatever you’ve decided is best or worst.
Let's leave the poisoned or upturned bowls alone, as they don't even know the meaning of optimism. The level of pessimism is such that, a little poison today, a little poison tomorrow.... bad today, bad tomorrow. Everybody will get what’s due to them.

Those of you who are reading these lines can understand that the laws are all perfect, what's important is being able to use them. They're already there. And when someone says “why him and not me?” it's because that other person is using the law while you are using your minds to put limits on yourselves. You are using it in the worst possible way; the other instead is using it in the best way. “Bad luck to those who think bad, good luck to those who think good”.
Then, if the opposite happens...it seems so. If somebody thinks bad and they get lucky, they have been forgotten by the laws because they've already been sentenced. It is their last life with their last wish. As I see it.
“But those people are criminals and everything goes right for them!” Evidently God forgot about them because they have already been sentenced to the other path. It’s your last life with your last wish. That’s how I see it.
“But they are malefactors and everything’s turning out well for them!” Evidently God has forgotten about them because in any case, by now, they’ve been condemned to the other path.
If instead a good person is unlucky, those are “slaps” to set the path straight. “Those people are so good and everything goes wrong for them”, let's say that they would very much want to be good and, every once in a while, a few “slaps” set them straight.
You will learn to be in peace with what you have, which only depends on you, and you will learn to move for everybody, which is better than you moving for yourselves.
I saw you looking happy when you understood that we had concretely begun our course of action. Finally you started to understand what we were doing and this gives me reason to celebrate with you, eating with the idea that it’s not always true that “a full belly does not think about all those empty bellies”. Finally the full belly has thought about the empty one. Exterior participation does not count, what counts is, the inner determination to get the whole action happening. The determination to do what’s good for the good of others.
You must learn to be like this. You mustn’t be afraid of what needs be done, ever. Even a whole life spent over a wrong experiment is a wonderful achievement: you won't commit that error anymore. Hardly negligible!
A whole life spent over a wrong experiment? I wish it were so. It means, first of all, that the experiment is “frightfully difficult”, secondarily, are you aware of the amount of experience you're accumulating?
Those of you who set off to do the right experiment straight away are fools. They start with the wrong foot because the first time they're unlucky they feel frustrated, then they get unlucky for a second and a third time. So they get scared, crushed, and think: “I can’t take it any more”. It isn’t possible to do this! And so on and so forth. And all because they started with the wrong foot.
One sets off on the path to achieve something, then all the rest is learning!

Download - New!



	Send to a friend \| Search \| Login/sign up \| Italiano \|
	Home Guide to the Site What's new That Which Has Been Said Words? 119. On the Avatar (Part 4) 118. On the Avatar (Part 3) 117. On the Avatar (Part 2) 115. On Experimenting 106. On the Avatar 101. On Interaction (Entanglement) 39. On The Angel 38. On 'The Other' 35. On The Gravity Of The Absolute (Part 1) 33. On The Continuance Of Existence (Part 2) 32. Disorderly Steps In The Phenomenal (Questions) 31. On The Continuance of Existence (Part 1) 30. The Path To The Base (Part 3) 29. Disorderly Steps in the Phenomenal (Value) 28. On the Boundary (of the Mind) 27. The Boundary on the Center 26. On the Equanimity in the World of Phenomena 25. On the Consciousness of Phenomena 24. Pure Uncontaminated Consciousness 23. On the Nature of Events 22. On The Invisible Being 21. The Tear 20. The Path To The Base (Part 2) 19. The Path To The Base (Part 1) 18. On Transmission 17. On the Two Points 16. On The Boundary-Non Boundary 15. The Harmonic Inconceivable Interaction 14. On The Emptiness of Identity 13. Themes Related To The Base 12. A Vision Of The Base 11. Undefined Paradise 10. On Non-Action 09. Thusness 08. Emptiness 07. Skillful Means 06. On Love 05. On The Paradise Within 04. On Wisdom 03. The Mind Appendix	On Interaction (Entanglement) You are rich to the same degree that you have done, and to the same degree that you want to do, good to others. Among you there are, and “rightly so”, also those who, internally poor, think about everything except helping other people, because they have too many personal problems. Others, instead, have various kinds of disorders, for example the Resentful Recipient Syndrome. They were, and still are, bowls that are poisoned, upturned, fractured, indeed all the more so. For sure you have achieved a wonderful thing: the certainty of having done, in one lifetime, what could be considered the highest good. “Doing good” is not the theory of eco-terrorists, the bio-poisoned and other mafias and ideologies. These bio-terrorists, and suchlike, only instigate fear. Doing good means treading a healthy path, which - if you keep behaving like “good seekers” - will allow you to proceed in a healthy way in all the sciences and in the different repercussions of research. I hope that your “university of research” will come into being with a Nobel Prize, a technical revolution and a resolution for the world, on the hunger/energy level and with an economy and finance completely unyoked from the systems that serve only to exploit and dominate “the perennial losers”. It is clear: it doesn’t pay to be subjected to any of the investment and finance schemes we have been “administered” until now. As already explained, the shaman is concerned with a certain kind of entanglement. If you learn to do even more what you already are, you’ll be more concretely involved in those entanglement relations that will go towards creating “the right situation”, the one that each one has already chosen. The right situation is always what you decide for everybody's good: that is the right “thing” for you. Still if that “you” is only egotism, rest assured that it will never work. If you are at a certain level and you realize that your “for the others” is always all for you, that's real egotism. “How much” is your entanglement? With “how many” particles? Of how many beings? What is the meaning of this separation of the entanglements based on the number of spins? It means that you're still isolated, you don't have universal consciousness. Here’s where the Avatar's “trick” lies, it’s just a matter of not being only yourselves; one “looks like” oneself but one is also the others: one is the one who’s starving, who eats more, who is ill, who is healthy... You think that it's not profitable, well, you’re making the mistake of identifying yourselves exclusively with a little bit of “meat”, a few sensations and a stream of mental inventions. Unfortunately this is the job you should be doing. Those who are not yet ready to operate will have the chance to study and live quietly; others instead, after having studied, will start to work concretely. You work until you have seriously learnt to walk the right Way, not according to the stale criteria belonging to systems aimed at maintaining a certain status quo worldwide: a billion and two hundred million people are destined to die of hunger; a few millions of Chinese individuals who aim at global slavery (even if they already own over a billion slaves); the Americans getting hooked on Chinese technological and economic control; the eco-imperialists’ decided determination to prevent Africa from utilizing the most advanced technologies and all the various deceitful and misleading strategies for domination (see: Eco-Imperialism: Green Power, Black Death)1 We are not dying from malaria and other kinds of illnesses anymore, whereas in the developing countries millions are dying (because DDT hurts!) It didn't hurt us, and there are no more mosquitoes. About twenty years ago, a scientist said that - because of DDT – a generation of bears with both male and female genital organs were born. This is the “damage” caused by DDT. What about the millions of people who die because it is not being used? Animal rights activists become enraged if an animal dies, yet they don't care about the death of a billion and two hundred million human beings, including children. Be aware, then, that we have to commit ourselves to a job which is different from the one we have performed until now. Have you started to understand entanglement? If you become what you “are in Reality” it’s good enough, you’re giving each other a hand. It doesn’t take much; all it takes is being and non-being at one and the same time. When necessary, “being”; when not necessary, “non-being”. Maybe this is the symbolism of the teaching of Christ handed down to us: “If someone slaps you on the right cheek, turn the other cheek”, but if you don't have the other cheek... (you are non-being). If someone strikes you on that cheek that is, namely “being”, turn the other “non-being” cheek so nobody can strike you. It’s simply a matter of not being. Understand? If you're “being” you are upset, if you are “non-being” you don't get upset! Nobody can strike you. It is necessary to know how to use your opponent’s energies as well, otherwise what kind of “martial art” is this? It is fun to fight without using our own strength but simply making use of the other person’s strength: you don’t even have to move, they're going to harm themselves on their own anyway. We need to talk about technology and connect it to evolution. Technology is the connected activation of certain laws in the Base. All laws are in the timeless Base and become “activated” (they become awareness and knowledge for sentient beings) little by little, (in illusory time) depending on the evolutionary coincidences of the projects. Therefore, in this moment, both in the project and in the clock of the universe, certain laws had to be “activated” but then everything depends on how the consciousness in individuals moves and if such evolutions are used for good or for evil. Let's just try and understand what this technology is for: it will soon become known to the general public. With this technology it is possible to use what is good and pure by disaggregating matter. Humanity needs something pure; in fact the World Food Program (WFP) deals both with quantity and QUALITY of food. By decomposing matter into its different constituent parts, this technology makes use of what is healthy because it separates it from what is not. Then again, what's not healthy as food can be good for energy or other purposes (for example lignin and cellulose). This technology could even turn a very toxic plant into something edible, by extracting the poison and separating it from the non-noxious components. Those who oppose this are beings that, psychologically speaking, cannot use their good part – maybe because they don't have one and what they have is mental mystification – thus they cannot participate in what is good. The use of this “?” technology is the use of a few laws put together that are, yes, always present, but not in use. Some people are not bad but they have a mental block that prevents them from catching and developing a series of “suggestions” (right things) that would make them understand. Being good is not enough; one also needs to be able to implement all the possible projections of what has been discovered at the scientific level. It's not that one must not trust beings per se; their minds are not to be trusted. If one can't see what should be (science) in their intellect, then what can I do? You have not managed to accumulate what is needed in your intellect, therefore give us no advice! You are not here today, you will be in the next world; and if not in the next world, you will be in the next universe (IRONIC). All the laws are already present and their use can be “improper” - like the atomic bomb – and “proper”, like well-employed radioactivity in medical technology. Both generate different kinds of pain but one could not really say that those pains are not “due” because, in the Perfection of the Absolute this, too, is already considered. It's simple. God is for everybody; each one for themselves and god for all Therefore, certain laws are usable only if they take the correct path, otherwise they are not discovered. If they come out, it means that the moment is right, also because I find one billion and 200 millions of starving people rather excessive. It's the signal that it is time to make a change, the only possible one. To prevent it they would have to stop a “?”, that turns a cheek to you one time and then turns another next time. They would have to stop people whose intent, I believe, is pure....not everybody indeed, there are always those who are more egotist, who have personal interests, who haven't given all of themselves, those who did as much as they could or as little as they could, when they could, at different times....It doesn't count if it's at different times, not even if they were times from another existence, a previous life. It's all the same. It would be the same thing even if one of you had taken the trouble as a caveman to bring food to everybody rather than eating it alone. That alone would already be enough to make that person adequate for operating. “Capturing” a system organized by laws, that are already present, is allowed only because there are expectations for using it correctly. “Correct” means that it must not be used to maintain the status quo of hunger and utilized egotistically by opportunists who only mind their own business. The implications are infinitesimal and don't cause any preoccupation, in that we are not the ones who have to worry, but the others. I do not intend to worry and I don't believe that you're going to use the laws in a bad way. I believe in your good intentions of putting a stop to the destruction caused by materialism, egotism, unconcern for the world's hunger. It's obvious, how can those who have hunger problems of their own be worried about the world's hunger problems? We will try and arrange things so that those who work in our direction need not worry anymore about their own survival and also get rid of all their prejudices in their relationships with different persons, since everybody has their unique and individual path. The “spread” (interaction) in the universe is different. All those beings aiming at their own individuality are aiming at their separation, their personal gain and they separate themselves from the vaster “spread” that makes one fully become what one is: being right through to the very soul (therefore physical, astral, mental, intellect and soul) and non-being. Thus we understand each other better and, as we speak, your worries will disappear little by little. Until you reach the Soul everybody can focus on themselves, on their “fulcrum”. Until you reach the Soul this is allowed. The “fulcrum” would be the central part of the spider-net entanglement, of the “spread” of the universal entanglement. Sooner or later you're going to think: “until now I have separated myself, how can I unite myself now?” Having only been used to being united in a physical sense, you will find difficulties at the sensational level: “I can't stand that person, he makes my skin crawl”. At the mental level, it is even worse, the mental pain that you experience is horrible and there are times I can't even conceive or understand it; you self-generate a series of situations that represent the “experimentation” you're going to knock your head (mind) against. You are what attracts that experience, you go looking for it because you create it. What does the system tell you? You already are, deep inside you, the Nature of the Absolute, therefore you are already being and non-being, you are already “more Reality”, you're already a Realized-One and so on; you have the freedom of deciding about your future, are you deciding that it will be wonderful? It will be. Don't do the opposite, it's not worth it! You chose it yourself, in your Divine Reality. You represent your own future: go ahead, you’re more than welcome to whatever you’ve decided is best or worst. Let's leave the poisoned or upturned bowls alone, as they don't even know the meaning of optimism. The level of pessimism is such that, a little poison today, a little poison tomorrow.... bad today, bad tomorrow. Everybody will get what’s due to them. Those of you who are reading these lines can understand that the laws are all perfect, what's important is being able to use them. They're already there. And when someone says “why him and not me?” it's because that other person is using the law while you are using your minds to put limits on yourselves. You are using it in the worst possible way; the other instead is using it in the best way. “Bad luck to those who think bad, good luck to those who think good”. Then, if the opposite happens...it seems so. If somebody thinks bad and they get lucky, they have been forgotten by the laws because they've already been sentenced. It is their last life with their last wish. As I see it. “But those people are criminals and everything goes right for them!” Evidently God forgot about them because they have already been sentenced to the other path. It’s your last life with your last wish. That’s how I see it. “But they are malefactors and everything’s turning out well for them!” Evidently God has forgotten about them because in any case, by now, they’ve been condemned to the other path. If instead a good person is unlucky, those are “slaps” to set the path straight. “Those people are so good and everything goes wrong for them”, let's say that they would very much want to be good and, every once in a while, a few “slaps” set them straight. You will learn to be in peace with what you have, which only depends on you, and you will learn to move for everybody, which is better than you moving for yourselves. I saw you looking happy when you understood that we had concretely begun our course of action. Finally you started to understand what we were doing and this gives me reason to celebrate with you, eating with the idea that it’s not always true that “a full belly does not think about all those empty bellies”. Finally the full belly has thought about the empty one. Exterior participation does not count, what counts is, the inner determination to get the whole action happening. The determination to do what’s good for the good of others. You must learn to be like this. You mustn’t be afraid of what needs be done, ever. Even a whole life spent over a wrong experiment is a wonderful achievement: you won't commit that error anymore. Hardly negligible! A whole life spent over a wrong experiment? I wish it were so. It means, first of all, that the experiment is “frightfully difficult”, secondarily, are you aware of the amount of experience you're accumulating? Those of you who set off to do the right experiment straight away are fools. They start with the wrong foot because the first time they're unlucky they feel frustrated, then they get unlucky for a second and a third time. So they get scared, crushed, and think: “I can’t take it any more”. It isn’t possible to do this! And so on and so forth. And all because they started with the wrong foot. One sets off on the path to achieve something, then all the rest is learning! Download - New!