The Boundary on the Center

A problem (which we have previously referred to) is the relationship between infinite and infinitesimal, hidden within the theme “the circle and the circumference.” There lies the solution to this dilemma as well as to the dilemma of proximity to God.

In the chapter “On Consciousness of Phenomena” I discussed the topic of “Quadrilemma,” which is the dualistic vision, the binary code in its four possible developments: 00, 01, 10, 11. The boundary four.

In the circumference and within, the circle is composed of infinite points. However, infinite points exist in the circumference which are perfectly distant in the same way, as one can trace infinite diameters passing through a single point, the center, and through the two most distant points in the circumference. The two most distant points are infinite, because the points in the circumference at the maximum distance with respect to the circle are infinite, and they all pass through a single central point. Therefore, we have infinite diameters passing through a single center which link the two most distant points in the circumference (that is precisely what the diameter is).

Why is pi (π) (the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter) a decimal to the infinite, that is, why does it have infinite decimals? The reason is that we cannot “theorize,” on a mathematical level, the meeting of the infinitesimal with the infinite. The points at maximum distance (in a circumference) are always only two, three if we count the central one. But the central point is valid for all the infinite diameters which pass through it.

We have now unveiled the mystery of the sentient being and the Absolute with pi, one of the crucial and fundamental points of the dilemma. Square root of 2! What two? This is also a huge dilemma. Does mathematics intend to use infinity? Or does it tend to hide this discussion – since it has not yet been cleared up – of why infinite decimals exist in the square root of two? Is it because pi exists?

There is a lack of clarity, mathematics in itself does not represent anything, unless one gives values to things. And it is the human mind that gives these values. What value does the human mind give to infinity? What value does it give to the infinitesimal? None, because it is unreachable and not actual1. In order for something to be considered concrete at the scientific level it must be actual (or realizable), if not, it is not scientific.

We need to clarify the ratio that exists, always and in any case, in all existing things, whatever the theories. It is a ratio in an area or zone of an infinite straight line, where on one side we have the infinitesimal and the point, and on the other side, the Center which also makes infinite radiuses.

If we have one center, whatever the distances in that circumference and therefore in that circle, then a single point exists where all ratios collapse. That point should be a concept that ends in a black hole (or in a point?).

As the black hole contains the horizon of events, we theorize that it is endowed with a dimension. But if there is a horizon of events, the dimension is illusory at the same moment in which the horizon is a sphere made up of infinite circles. The collapse in a point of the black hole, no matter which point, is always the central point (almost always). Is matter without Space-time in the black hole uniform or not? Whatever the collapse of an entire universe, it takes place in an infinitesimal. To furnish an infinitesimal dimension to all things is obligatory at the very moment in which we relate them to infinity.

Here we have the obligatory vision of God, of the Absolute in mathematics. It's not true that it is impossible to explain the sentient being-infinity relationship. It can be explained with two concepts: the square root of two and pi, where it seems like we are forced to use two terms, infinitesimal and Infinite. If in mathematics we are obligated to use infinitesimal and Infinite, then we will certainly have to use them in philosophy and when speaking of being. We cannot detach ourselves from the use of mathematics because we do not have, or we do not truly comprehend, terms such as infinitesimal and infinite. Why is mathematics used only in a manner which is organized to not reach comprehension? Just as in all forms of power, when something is not explained it is an enigma, a dogma, a mystery. But there is no mystery.

One times one equals one, after one, you never reach two. How can you reach two? It would be as if we had two Gods or two Absolutes. We don't reach two: 1, ō1 1, ō2 etc.

When a solution does not permit comprehension, there lies dogma, mayhem and chaos created on purpose. I hope to be able to “help” you (with useless words) in your understanding of unsolved philosophical and mathematical themes. It's important that you begin to intuit.

There are infinite points in the area of a circle. What is the diameter? The two most distant points in the circumference. Why are they the most distant? Because they pass through the center? Maybe there, even without words, one perceives that every sentient being is that center. Everyone is necessarily the center of their own circumference: where do they see the universe from? From what point do they look around themselves? Where do their “radiuses” that observe the sky pass? Where are they? They are there! What a marvel: every sentient being is like a black hole! Each one is their own center that everything they see must pass through. With what dimensions? With what perceptions? Each individual is the horizon of their own events! No one looks at the sky passing through another center. Not even two lovers, looking at the sky, see it from the same center, unless (like bosons) they superimpose their centers, losing their identities. In that case, a single radius originates from that center and perceives the world of phenomena.

What is the maximum distance of your capacity of perception? That distance makes you your own center and your own circle. Everyone has their points of maximum distance; their diameter - this means that each individual has an area of perception. Based on their area of perception, they have both expressed and unexpressed potentials, due to the wonderful invention of pi, whose dimensions may never be known. This is the Perfection of the Construction of the Absolute, of the Great Architect! Why? Because if I were able to calculate my dimensions, I would lose my Freedom.

Now all the words used in Eastern philosophies and religions become clear: Dharma, Karma, Samsara etc., all created by the particular “brain mapping” of the Eastern brain. Even after studying Eastern languages, our brain mapping remains Western. Let's use our Western brain mapping! Let's leave the East alone for awhile, as it is filling us up with poison, deviations, dead monks and errors.

Those who separate themselves are overturned bowls that never listened, or poisoned bowls that poisoned the teaching, or fractured bowls which lost the teaching. Vacillating bowls seek to reach stability as they are filled (a bowl becomes heavy and therefore stable only when it's full). Then the full bowl must empty itself of the value of useful words and remain perfectly empty, so as to perform its function of being always ready to learn. Then, saturated with useful words, it can finally use the useless ones. It will always be filled, while always maintaining itself empty. It will overcome the dichotomy between full and empty and will finally understand the circle, the circumference and the point. It will also understand why pi has infinite decimals, because it is there that Infinite and infinitesimal come together, and it will also understand why √2 (the square root of two) that does not return to One.

What I have told you is meant to help you to intuit. If you understood it, you are wrong. If you intuited it, you became aware of the Perfect game prepared for you by the Absolute. Sometimes it is difficult for sages to insert themselves into the game. A demon is a better player (as a demon tastes the immense power of the Freedom of the Absolute) with respect to those who are familiar with and have truly analyzed certain themes. I'm not saying all of them because the themes that are studied along the path are innumerable (never infinite, because the same distance - in decimals - in pi is in the diameter). This means that no one has infinite experiences, rather, innumerable experiences are gradually acquired and everybody will eventually have them. How can we say how vast the experiences in a circle are? A circle, if you think about it, but, only when it is the Point is it an Angel, only when it is Point is it at the Beginning.

The first sentient being is a point with four surrounding points, there is no physical body yet: it is an Angel, but before that it is a Point. From there on the vastness of the circumference grows; after a while the points increase and suddenly become infinite, because the infinite implications of the acquired potential create infinite directions - first there is one direction. As an Angel, you decide whatever point and whatever direction (you already have infinite directions around you, but you are not frightened by the immensity of the Absolute), you have four directions. After four, they suddenly become infinite.

The quantity of points within the circle becomes almost infinite. At a certain point they become innumerable, but the sentient being continues to see a point, but you have not almost realized a circumference. We might say that the circumference is already at four surrounding points, but the points of the circumference are not infinite. The evolutionary process then leads you to create the area or zone of your circle, with innumerable directions, and you suddenly find yourself looking for the rays that emanate from you, without even being able to calculate the diameter (part of the aspects of your nature) of the circumference any longer. From that condition, you would like to truly calculate the points in the circumference, you would like anyway to calculate the points within the circle, in the area, but it can no longer be done.

The precise reason that the aspect of the Freedom of the Absolute does not allow you to realize It, or know It, nor deepen your comprehension of the themes of the Perfection of the Creation of the Absolute, because otherwise you would lose your freedom. Sentient beings possess a freedom that seekers of spiritual realization don't have any more: the freedom to doubt, the freedom of maybe, the freedom to say “there is or there isn't,” the freedom which is present in the binary system of the Quadrilemma.

It is difficult for a seeker to make a mistake. It's normal, the error does not exist in the Perfection of the Absolute. This, though, does not imply “acting smart” with the Absolute (with the excuse that one does not make mistakes), it only means to respect all events and sentient beings. It is right that every being lives, sometimes, exclusively with a little portion, from where they see that segment that they believe to be their sky. That segment can measure 0.1°, 2°, 5°, 80° or 90°, which is a quarter of the circumference. Donkeys have this kind of visual range. Fools are only able to see a limited angle, less than 90°, of the entire circumference. Like donkeys, they see that and based on that they proceed. But why condemn or blame them, if even we live within limited segments or angles? This will help you to better understand one of the next chapters, it is the foundation of what tomorrow might be a discourse about love and compassion.

I already hinted at something about love and also the equanimity in form, then there will be the right equanimity, then the sublime one, because any word takes on different aspects according to the kind of teaching to which we are subjected. We cannot say that a word has a single, absolute value, a word has a relative value based on the level and ability of perception of individual. You will learn that useful words only have one level, the fool's level. Actually useless words, exactly because they are eventually cancelled, encompass all levels. Only then... when they are cancelled, do they embrace 360° of the point of consciousness within the circle and, consequently, its circumference.

In the human dimensions there is a “front” and “back,” but in spatial dimensions there are not. The Earth has no front, back, above, below, etc. Any system which is immersed in the world of phenomena does not have, in reality, neither front nor back, neither past nor future, neither high nor low... Those who live at the South Pole aren't upside down! Consequently we never have a dimension, not even a flat one, of the radius and the circumference, it is a simplification that is made in order not to confuse.

For now let's stop at the circumference and the circle, as we will arrive at the vaster and most various dimensionality progressively, as in all things. Gradually we will realize that, once the whole comprehension of a circumference and a circle is established, going on to the infinite circumferences and circles that constitute the infinite slices of a sphere will be easy.

Sentient beings, in their illusory and apparent identities, rotate, yet do not rotate because, as they live in the dimensions of movement, of phenomena, they believe themselves to phenomenon with a “before” and an “after.” In reality they are not “floating” entities like phenomenon in a separate world of phenomena, but a continuance of continuity.

We are simply a system of continuity within a huge apparatus of cause and effect: the world of phenomena. We will no longer use the word “reincarnation” due to the erroneous use that has been made of words from the past, polluted by the stupidity of a humanity controlled by ignorance. Those who are controlled by ignorance deserve their fate.

We are the point in the center, the diameter and the circumference. Therefore, necessarily, we are the entire circle. This is the will of the Absolute. This does not alter the relationship infinitesimal-Infinite, but gives birth to a strange idea - sometimes the one with the small “o” would like to be confounded with the One with the capital “O.” The One is made up of infinite ones, that is the only thing that changes!

The ignorance of the one is its great freedom... suffering and joy, because it is within the world and the universe of duality. If you are not immersed in duality you cannot understand the One, if you are immersed in the One you cannot experience duality, otherwise no sentient being would have made the choice when they were an Angel. Being an Angel is very comfortable, so why do we choose to immerse ourselves in the washing machine of the infinite universes? Because we want to be free, it's more fun, even if we you can't really talk about it with those who live immersed in suffering.

The systems in which one encounters the greatest opportunities for understanding are those in which the sphere of comprehension is present. Only when the fourth sphere is present is the sentient being already born with a perspective for comprehension.

When children are born, their potential spheres are four right from the start, even if the experience is “spread” gradually. Initially, newborns only have the primary biological functions, they exist but do not comprehend. Then, when they start using the brain and understanding things, the learning process follows a sort of mandatory route which continues until the children start walking through the world. At that point the mandatory route ends and the child knows that, in order to walk, they must one step at a time. After having learned to walk, they typically stumble and hit their head. What are they doing? Learning.

The aim is the fourth sphere, in order to be able to make decisions. There, those who, after a long time, will become enlightened, gradually realized, are born.

Pi exists beginning from the four-sphere universes and up. When only three spheres are present, hypothesizing the squaring of the circle is difficult. The square drawn starting from a circumference is not a square, because two sides are longer than one point. The squaring of the circle cannot be performed. If we theorize two diameters crossing each other at the center, forming a 90° angle, we will not obtain 90° because of the infinitesimals, as the space is curved. Consequently, two of the points crossed do not coincide with the distance of the other two that lie on the hypotenuse, and we find ourselves drawing a square with two sides that have two additional points. How can we calculate those two additional points? It can't be done, that's why the circle “does not get squared.”

In the circle, the two additional points do not permit division by 4. You cannot see them but they prevent the square from being drawn, as the universe does not permit a precise definition. No system allows a precise definition. If this was not the case, we could find a precise definition of the creation and this cannot happen, otherwise the Absolute would have permitted it long ago. Evidently the reason for the Perfection of the Absolute lies in the fact that the sentient being must not and cannot reach the Absolute through calculations. That would render everything dry, sterile and demonstrable.

Thoughts, mental problems - forget the use of the mind. Do not look for explanations acquiring the aspects of a solution. The solution is an already eaten and pre-digested food. Do you want to know how it tasted? If someone tells you, then – satiated – you are not going to look for the “food” within yourself.

I never satiated myself with other people's awarenesses and have always remained unhappy. They told me about rice, why I am always hungry? I hope this is not the case for you. You should be happy about feeling inwardly torn to pieces, due to the lack of a solution, for having no way out. Either you discover within or you will have nothing; but what you discover is impossible to communicate to others, even if you want to, because you have found your own food, eaten it and are satiated by it. What is intuition for one person is rotten food to another. Do you have any intuitions? Do not think about how to use them, you'll ruin them. Those who say “I didn't understand anything” feel better than the others. It's better that way! Be careful not to understand too much when you read!

Download - New!